Weaver v. Millbrook Central School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[the] [defendant [did] not contest the SRO’s finding that the IEP did not provide a FAPE,” and analyzing the appropriateness of the student’s placement accordingly
• “Student has some known triggers, but they are inconsistent. The only aspect of Student’s behavior that is consistent is his self-harming.”
• progress alone does not demonstrate that private placement was appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).