Weaver v. Cannon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute of limitations is excepted where employees suffer discrimination “pursuant to a continuous practice and policy of discrimination”
• concluding that reference to “eight year rule” for employment promotion sufficient to alert EEOC to potential disparate-impact claim
• concluding that reference to “eight year rule” for employment promotion sufficient to alert EEOC to potential disparate-impact claim
• concluding that reference to “eight year rule” for employment promotion sufficient to alert EEOC to potential disparate-impact claim
• noting that although EEOC complaints “most naturally support a claim of intentional discrimination,” facts alleged also support disparate-impact claim
• noting that although EEOC complaints “most naturally support a claim of intentional discrimination,” facts alleged also support disparate-impact claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).