Skip to main content
· 7/21/1989

Weaver ex rel. Weaver v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

Citations

  • 717 F. Supp. 1039
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding allegation that defendant's \principal place of business [is] in 12 California\ insufficient to plausibly allege advertising at issue originated from California
  • noting that, in the absence of any allegations that “the tortious conduct occurred at least in 26 part in California,” the fact that a company’s principal place of business was in the state made the 27 1 allegations merely possible, not plausible
  • dismissing statutory tort claim and breach of fiduciary duty claim against Fannie Mae and observing that “the Merrill doctrine has been applied to both contract and tort-based claims”
  • “if insurance were available from a number of carriers at different rates — all subject to filed-rates — the filed-rate doctrine would not protect a loan servicer who chooses a carrier and a policy with a rate higher than others simply to receive a kickback not available from other carriers”
  • both kickback and backdating claims not preempted
  • dismissing claims against Fannie Mae

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mukasey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.