Weaver-Dowdy Co. v. Brewer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indecent exposure statute properly applied, despite fact that the conduct occurred within the defendant’s apartment, where it was plainly visible to others on the outside
• “ ‘While the exposure must be intentional and not accidental, the intent required is only a general one, and need not be directed toward any specific person or persons.’ ” (quoting Peyton v. Dist. of Columbia, 100 A.2d 36, 37 (D.C.1953)
• “ ‘While the exposure must be intentional and not accidental, the intent required is only a general one, and need not be directed toward any specific person or persons.’ ” (quoting Peyton v. Dist. of Columbia, 100 A.2d 36, 37 (D.C. 1953)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).