Weatherspoon v. Tony's Seafood, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that ‘‘parents do not have a ‘double jeopardy’ defense against repeated state termination efforts’’
• ‘‘[t]he fact that [an improper standard] was mentioned in the trial court’s decision as a desirable goal and may have culminated in the same result as the statutory criteria does not require a conclusion that the court based its decision on that [improper] standard’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).