Skip to main content
· 12/13/2004

Weatherly v. Universal Music Publishing Group

Citations

  • 23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 157
  • 125 Cal. App. 4th 913
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 481
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 408
  • 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 2309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The duty of diligence does not create a duty to continuously monitor a [licensee] to ensure 19 compliance with its obligations, absent any reason to otherwise suspect a breach. The law does 20 not inject such paranoia into the licensor-licensee relationship.”
  • “Where no duty is imposed by 14 law to make inquiry, and where, under the circumstances, a prudent man would not be put on 15 inquiry, the mere fact that means of knowledge are open and not availed of does not operate to 16 give constructive notice of the facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.