Skip to main content
· 11/6/1945

Weatherford v. Radcliffe

Citations

  • 63 F. Supp. 107
  • 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant failed to preserve issue for appellate review by failing to object to a laboratory report and by stipulating to -6- facts included in the substance of the report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waring

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.