Weatherall Aluminum Products Co. v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a buyer's invitation to visit the home to provide an estimate for home improvements did not automatically divest the buyer of protections under California's door-to-door sales laws
• holding that a buyer’s invitation to visit the home to provide an estimate for home improvements did not automatically divest the buyer of protections under Califor nia’s door-to-door sales laws
• the fact that the seller went to the buyer’s home in response to a phone call from the buyer was insufficient to remove a contract from the statute’s scope
• fact “that the seller appears at the buyer’s home in response to a phone call from a 15 buyer is insufficient to remove a contract from the statute’s ambit.”
• “[T]he definition of the phrase ‘home solicitation’ in the 14 statute focuses not on who initiated the contact between buyer and seller, but on where the 15 contract was made.”
• applying California Civ.Code Ann. § 1689.5 et seq. 8

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).