Weardon v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that court would, at some future date, award subpoenaed witnesses their reasonable costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in complying with subpoenas
• modifying subpoena to reflect plaintiffs narrower scope as contended in plaintiff's brief
• modifying subpoena to reflect plaintiff's narrower scope as contended in plaintiff's brief
• “The status of a witness as a nonparty entitles the witness to consideration regarding expense and inconvenience.”
• “Williams maintains that Babcock’s and Carter’s failure to comply with Rule 45(d)(2) [now restyled Rule 45(e)(2
• narrowing third-party subpoena requiring production of “any and all” documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).