W.E. Callaway, Jr. v. John R. Block

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would address on the merits statutory construction and due process claims since the parties’ arguments went to the merits, no factual disputes existed, and the questions raised were purely legal questions
• approving Hurwitz manoeuver \as long as the facts are not disputed and the parties have presented their arguments to the court\
• requiring adherence to agency's construction of statute absent compelling indication of error
• reaching merits on appeal from denial of preliminary injunction because “both sides’ arguments go to the merits, no facts are at issue and the questions raised are purely legal ones”
• requiring adherence to agency’s construction of statute absent compelling indication of error
• “Appellants have no protected property interest in quotas per se nor in the specific quotas they had in 1983 or any other price year.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).