W.C. & A.N. Miller Companies v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that similar AEF regulations did not apply to AUES, but instead were “related to combat forces and battlefield activity”
• FTCA claim against the United States survived because the complaint alleged that “the Army had already made a decision to warn. Its failure to effectuate that decision properly was not itself the product of a policy decision.”
• reaching the same conclusion about the 1913 regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).