Wayne Wright, Individually, and Wayne Wright, LLP, D/B/A Wayne Wright Injury Lawyers v. Erika v. Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no provision requiring parties’ signatures, and parties’ affidavits showed that the employer presented, maintained, and sought to enforce the arbitration agreement
• holding that—despite the absence of an its signature in the provided signature block—an employer’s signature was not a condition precedent to the enforceability of an employment agreement because (1) the agreement did not expressly require the signature, (2
• distinguishing such cases because agreement at issue did not have provision requiring amendments to be signed
• distinguishing Bunzl on the basis that “the parties’ agreement in the present case did not contain any provision expressly requiring that the agreement itself or any modifications to the agreement be signed by the parties”
• party’s signature on contract creates a “strong presumption” that the party assented to the contract
• party’s signature on contract creates a “strong presumption” that the party assented to the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).