Wayne v. Blun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing retaliation cause of action in complaint because plaintiff's sole purported “protected activity” was her request for additional leave time to accommodate her alleged disability
• dismissing claim that plaintiff was fired in retaliation for requesting additional leave time to accommodate her disability because plaintiff failed to allege “that her request was made in opposition to a practice forbidden by” the NYHRL
• “The plaintiff alleged in her complaint that her employment was terminated in retaliation for requesting additional leave time to accommodate her disability. However, she did not allege that her request was made in opposition to a practice forbidden by the state or city Human Rights Laws”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).