Wayne Ramsay v. James Bailey, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a district court’s “warnings that dismissal would result from continued failure to proceed properly” supported a dismissal with prejudice (citing 9 Wright & Miller § 2370)
• noting that a district court’s “warnings that dismissal would result from continued failure to proceed properly” supported a dismissal with prejudice (citing 9 Wright & Miller § 2370)
• “However novel and interesting may be these constitutional claims, it is our duty to decide this case on other grounds if possible.”
• “[A] proper sanction for a failure to respond to a motion to dismiss [is] for the trial court to decide the motion on the papers before it.”
• “[A] proper sanction for a failure to respond to a motion to dismiss [is] for the trial court to decide the motion on the papers before it.”
• because “plaintiff was fully and repeatedly apprised of the possible imposition of the . . . sanction [of dismissal]” the district court need not consider “possible alternative sanctions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).