· 5/22/2013
Wayne LaFountain v. Shirlee Harry
Citations
- 716 F.3d 944
- 85 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1166
- 2013 WL 2221569
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district courts must screen a complaint filed by an indigent non-prisoner under § 1915(e)(2
- holding that “[u]nder Rule 15(a) a district court can allow a plaintiff to amend his complaint . . . .”
- holding that “[u]nder Rule 15(a) a district court can allow a plaintiff to amend his complaint . . . .”
- holding that district courts must screen a complaint filed by an indigent non-prisoner under § 1915(e)(2
- holding that “[u]nder Rule 15(a) a district court can allow a plaintiff to amend his complaint even when the complaint is subject to dismissal under the PLRA”
- holding that “[u]nder Rule 15(a) a district court can allow a plaintiff to amend his complaint even when the complaint is subject to dismissal under the PLRA”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Gibbons, Kethledge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.