Wayne D. Norton v. Caremark, Inc., Baxter Health Care Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding admission of CPA’s lost pay calculations because assumptions, even if flawed, were not ″so ″fundamentally unsupported’ that they ″offered no assistance to the jury’″ (quoting Loudermill v. Dow Chem. Co., 863 F.2d 566, 570 (8th Cir. 1988))
• “All allegations of material fact are taken as true and 21 construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
• denial of motion for new trial reviewed for clear abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).