Skip to main content
· 6/17/1997

Wayne County v. Britton Trust

Citations

  • 563 N.W.2d 674
  • 454 Mich. 608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a fixture is “annexed” to a premises when it is “in some manner or means, albeit slight, attached or affixed, either actually or constructively, to the realty”
  • noting that the defendants did not claim the taking at issue included “the ‘going concern value’ of their company, i.e., the company’s goodwill”
  • emphasizing that the focus on the intent prong is not the annexor’s subjective intent, but rather, the objective, visible facts
  • stating that intent is determined by “objective visible facts” from the “surrounding circumstances”
  • explaining that intent may be inferred from the nature of the article, the purpose for which it was affixed, and the manner in which it was annexed to the realty
  • The third element of the three-part fixture test is “intention to make the property a permanent accession to the realty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle, Brickley, Cavanagh, Kelly, Mallett, Riley, Weaver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.