· 12/18/2014
Wayne County Employees Retirement Sys v. Charter County of Wayne
Citations
- 497 Mich. 36
- 859 N.W.2d 678
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]he county’s abandonment of the issue on appeal. . . has left us ill equipped to address the merits” of the issue
- stating that “[t]he county’s abandonment of the issue on appeal . . . has left us ill equipped to address the merits” of the issue
- stating that “[t]he county’s abandonment of the issue on appeal . . . has left us ill equipped to address the merits” of the issue
- stating that “[t]he county’s abandonment of the issue on appeal . . . has left us ill equipped to address the merits” of the issue
- “Each year, the county is required by Const. 1963 art. 9, § 24, to make an ‘annual required contribution’ (ARC). An annual actuarial valuation determines the ARC amount.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young, Cavanagh, Markman, Kelly, Zahra, McCormack, Viviano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.