· 10/15/2012
Wayne Charles v. City of Los Angeles
Citations
- 697 F.3d 1146
- 40 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2672
- 2012 WL 4857194
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a billboard advertising a television program was subject to the Lanham Act
- “Where the facts present a close question, ‘strong 19 support’ that the speech should be characterized as commercial speech is found where the 20 speech is an advertisement, the speech refers to a particular product, and the speaker has 21 an economic motivation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wardlaw, Paez, Rawlinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.