Way v. Martin
Citations
- 140 Pa. 499
- 21 A. 428
- 1891 Pa. LEXIS 863
Syllabus
<p>1. The testimony submitted in an action for the breach of a warranty, on a contract of sale, showing that the negotiations occupied several interviews between the parties, it was error to confine the jury to the evidence of a warranty made at the time the sale was consummated.</p> <p>2. It was for the jury to say, in such case, whether the sale was made on the faith of the warranty alleged; and, to determine this question, they should have been directed to consider all that passed between the parties during the negotiations, in relation to the terms of the sale.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- exercising jurisdiction over petitioner’s claims against Bureau of Corrections employees as “ancillary to the claims against Commonwealth parties” pursuant to Section 761(c) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 761(c
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.