Way Bakery v. Truck Drivers Local No. 164 and James Zentgraf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to four-part test and reciting that we should uphold arbitration awards even when they contain a “serious” legal error
• referring to four-part test and reciting that we should uphold arbitration awards even when they contain a \serious\ legal error
• reviewing arbitrator's interpretation of discharge provisions and holding that the award drew its essence from the agreement
• referring to four-part test and reciting that we should uphold arbitration awards even when they contain a “serious” legal error
• reviewing arbitrator’s interpretation of discharge provisions and holding that the award drew its essence from the agreement
• “A court‟s review of an arbitration award is one of the narrowest standards of judicial 5 arbitrator‟s decision would be nonbinding, the statute provided no guidance as to what weight, if any, was to be given to the arbitrator‟s decision on appeal.11 (6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).