Waukesha County v. Pewaukee Marina, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding verdict supporting enforcement of zoning rules to prevent expansion of nonconforming marina that included changes in use
• \The violation of the nonconforming use by expansion or enlargement which changes the use invalidates the legal nonconforming use as well as the illegal change.\
• \Extension of Seitz's marina pier was simply an improvement of a legal nonconforming use to accommodate increased boater traffic; it did not change the use.\
• “The 10 No. 2025AP924 violation of the nonconforming use by expansion or enlargement which changes the use invalidates the legal nonconforming use as well as the illegal change.”
• “The 10 No. 2025AP924 violation of the nonconforming use by expansion or enlargement which changes the use invalidates the legal nonconforming use as well as the illegal change.”
• “The 10 No. 2025AP924 violation of the nonconforming use by expansion or enlargement which changes the use invalidates the legal nonconforming use as well as the illegal change.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).