Waugh v. Q. & C. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A person’s beliefs, superstitions, or affiliation with a religious group is properly admissible where probative of an issue in a criminal prosecution.”
• “Expert medical testimony concerning the truthfulness or credibility of a witness is generally inadmissible because it invades the jury’s province to make credibility determinations.”
• “Expert . . . testimony concerning the truthfulness or credibility of a witness is generally inadmissible because it invades the jury’s province to make credibility determinations.”
• “Absent unusual circumstances, expert medical testimony concerning the truthfulness or credibility of a witness is. . . . [generally inadmissible because it invades the jury’s province to make credibility determinations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).