Skip to main content
· 5/11/1914

Waugh v. Cook

Citations

  • 113 Ark. 127
  • 167 S.W. 103
  • 1914 Ark. LEXIS 485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no appellate review of denial of motion for disclosure because that motion is not identified in § 54-94a and trial court did not make determination that ruling on motion was dispositive of case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.