Skip to main content
· 6/1/1915

Waugh v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Miss.

Citations

  • 237 U.S. 589
  • 35 S. Ct. 720
  • 59 L. Ed. 1131
  • 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1371

Syllabus

<p>The equal protection provision of the Fourteenth Amendment does not forbid classification based on obvious and rational distinctibns.</p> <p>If a state police statute is not invalid under the Fourteenth Amendment, regulations of the proper officials making it effective are not invalid under that amendment. .</p> <p>A State may base a classification of the students in its educational institutions by putting those already connected with prganizatións, the joining of which is to-be prohibited by a police statute, into an excepted class by themselves; the classification is reasonable as legislation should not, on principles of construction and justice, be construed retrospectively.</p> <p>What regulations a State may establish as to the discipline of its educational institutions, and how such regulations shall be enforced, are ma+ters for the state courts to determine, and unless they deny due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment, the decision of the state court is conclusive.</p> <p>A State may establish the rule that students in its educational institutions shall not affiliate with fraternities, and even though such fraternities may be moral and beneficial in themselves, the prohibition is a matter within the wisdom of the state legislature and does not offend the due process provision of the Fourteenth Amendment.</p> <p>The statute of Mississippi of 1912 prohibiting Greek-letted fraternities and other societies in the educational institutions of the State is not unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, either as denying students due process of law or as denying some of them the equal protection of the law by reason of its permitting - those students already members of such societies to continue their membership under specified conditions.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • against the due process and equal protection—Fourteenth Amendment—attack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.