Watts v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The absence of the trial and sentencing transcripts makes it impossible for this Court to review [the appellant’s] various enumerations of error concerning factual merger, double jeopardy, and improper sentencing.”
• “The absence of the trial and sentencing transcripts makes it impossible for this Court to review [the appellant’s] various enumerations of error concerning factual merger, double jeopardy, and improper sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holman v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-10-31· cited 13×
• Watts v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-04-03· cited 1×
• Ulysses Holman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-09-10

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kegler v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1996-09-09· cited 25×
• Farris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-02-04· cited 5×