Watts v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Regarding whether the representation was fraudulent, this is an inquiry typically left to the jury as it often involves proof of intent by circumstantial evidence.”
• “[T]he public policy of the State is reflected in its statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).