Watts v. Polaczyk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a person that signs a contract is presumed to know the nature of the document and understand its contents
• “The existence of an arbitration agreement and the enforceability of its terms are judicial questions for the court rather than for the arbitrators.”
• “The existence of an arbitration agreement and the enforceability of its terms are judicial questions for the court rather than for the arbitrators.”
• “The existence of an arbitration agreement and the enforceability of its terms are judicial questions for the court rather than for the arbitrators.”
• “Michigan law presumes that one who signs a written agreement knows the nature of the instrument so executed and understands its contents.”
• “[M]erely contracting for ADR on issues of professional malpractice does not violate MRPC 1.8(h

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).