Skip to main content
· 10/15/1883

Watts v. Loomis

Citations

  • 81 Mo. 236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, although there was no direct evidence of who removed defendant’s sneakers, adequate foundation existed to admit them into evidence from officer testimony describing standard booking procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ewing, Norton, Sherwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.