· 10/15/1883
Watts v. Loomis
Citations
- 81 Mo. 236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, although there was no direct evidence of who removed defendant’s sneakers, adequate foundation existed to admit them into evidence from officer testimony describing standard booking procedure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ewing, Norton, Sherwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.