Skip to main content
· 1/30/1981

Watts v. Haun

Citations

  • 393 So. 2d 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jurisdiction was proper where a substantial portion of the tort occurred in Florida
  • complaint stated cause of action concerning interference with expectation to receive inter vivos gift
  • act essential for success of tort occurred in Florida

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.