Watts v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “settled principles provide that people do not relinquish control of items of value like drugs or leave them in places where others might find them”
• stating “we must consider the improperly admitted [evidence] in our sufficiency analysis”
• stating \we must consider the improperly admitted [evidence] in our sufficiency analysis\
• “[S]ettled principles provide that people do not relinquish control of items of value like drugs or leave them in places where others might find them.”
• establishing the elements of possession of a controlled substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).