Watts v. Alama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Finding dismissal of all Defendants, served and unserved, proper where the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3).
• “Settle’s consent was not required before the district court referred to the magistrate judge for a non-dispositive ruling . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).