Watters v. Treasure Mining & Reduction Co.
Citations
- 25 N.M. 305
- 181 P. 947
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Where a judicial sale has been confirmed, the purchaser has such an interest as to require notice to him oí an application to set aside the sale. He is an indispensable party to the proceeding-, and his omission is jurisdictional. This proposition is supported by all the authorities. P. 306</p> <p>2. A want of proper parties below appearing- upon the face of the record requires a reversal or dismissal on appeal, unless the objection has been waived. P. 307</p> <p>3. An application for the first time on appeal to add a new party comes too late, although such party might have been joined in the original action. P. 307</p>
Judges: Hanna, Parker, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dunning v. DunningIllinois Supreme Court· 1865-04-15· cited 25×
- Miller v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1912-10-28· cited 21×
- Comstock v. PurpleIllinois Supreme Court· 1868-09-15· cited 13×
- Ellguth v. EllguthIllinois Supreme Court· 1911-04-19· cited 7×
- Schulz v. HasseIllinois Supreme Court· 1907-04-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.