Watte v. EDGAR MAEYENS, JR., MD, PC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no IIED claim where employer threw a tantrum, screamed and yelled at his employees, accused them of being liars and saboteurs, then fired them all
• affirming dismissal of employees’ IIED claim because, among other reasons, “plaintiffs do not allege that they were falsely accused of criminal ... conduct, nor do they allege that defendant subjected them to an unwarranted criminal investigation”
• affirming dismissal of employees’ IIED claim because, among other reasons, “plaintiffs do not allege that they were falsely accused of criminal . . . conduct, nor do they allege that defendant subjected them to an unwarranted criminal investigation”
• no claim where employer threw a tantrum, screaming and yelling at his employees, accused them of being liars and saboteurs, then fired them all
• employer threw a tantrum, screamed and yelled at his employees, accused them of being liars and saboteurs, then fired them all
• no claim where employer threw a tantrum, screamed and yelled at his employees, accused them of being liars and saboteurs, then fired them all

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).