Watt v. Watt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties’ inability to agree on which private high school child would attend constituted substantial change in circumstances warranting modification of parenting plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• RACQUEL SCHOT v. KEVIN SCHOT
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-29· cited 5×
• Dickson v. Dickson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-17· cited 4×
• Teodoro v. Teodoro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-06
• McKivitz v. Waller
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pimm v. Pimm
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-05-28· cited 121×
• Wade v. Hirschman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-05-26· cited 94×
• Tietig v. Boggs
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-06-11· cited 19×
• Sotnick v. Sotnick
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-08· cited 14×
• Vazquez v. Vazquez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-28· cited 11×
• Hancock v. Hancock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-21· cited 1×