Watt v. Energy Action Educational Foundation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because one plaintiff had standing to bring the suit, the court need not consider the standing of the other plaintiffs
• finding that causation element of standing inquiry existed in case in which agency breached its procedural duties by failing to consider options raised by plaintiffs
• finding that causation element of standing inquiry existed in case in which agency breached its procedural duties by failing to consider options raised by plaintiffs
• noting that because one plaintiff had standing, the Court would not consider whether other plaintiffs had standing, relying on earlier Supreme Court cases
• determining that because one of the plaintiffs “has standing, we do not consider the standing of the other plaintiffs”
• finding that one plaintiff had standing and refraining from considering whether others also did

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).