Watson v. Sutro
Citations
- 103 Cal. 169
- 37 P. 201
- 1894 Cal. LEXIS 743
Syllabus
<p>Partition—Allowance of Attorney’s Fee—Question of Fact—Conflicting Evidence—Discretion.—The amount of an attorney’s fee to be allowed in an action for partition, is a question of fact, to be determined by the trial court from the evidence, and its findings will not be disturbed where there is a substantial conflict in the evidence, if there is sufficient evidence to support the allowance, and there is no clear abuse of discretion.</p>
Judges: Garoutte, Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-03-08· cited 51×
- Clancy v. PloverCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-05-23· cited 19×
- Bohan v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court· 1924-11-15· cited 14×
- Pearce v. AlbrightNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1904-03-03· cited 9×
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-03-29· cited 7×
- Johnston v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1970-06-08· cited 6×
- Murray v. HaysUtah Supreme Court· 1917-12-05· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.