Skip to main content
· 7/1/1901

Watson v. Succession of Barber

Citations

  • 105 La. 456

Syllabus

<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. Where in effecting a partition by authentic act, a surviving widower in community specifically admits that the other contracting party is the son and sole heir of his deceased wife, and they reciprocally convey to each other the immovable property of the community, neither such widower, nor his heirs, can, thereafter, for the purposes of a supplemental partition, and without alleging and proving that he was deceived by fraud practiced upon him by such other party, be heard to deny the admission so made.</p> <p>2. Where an authentic act is resorted to for the purpose of effecting -a partition, and it mentions immovable property, and disposes of it, and also mentions movable property, as existing and being subject to partition, but makes no disposition of it, the partition, as effected by said act, will not be held to be complete and final. And the action for a supplemental partition, one of the parties being in possession of all the property to be affected thereby, is barred only by the prescription of thirty years.</p> <p>3. Where the parties to an agreement fail to express themselves clearly, the court must endeavor, from the aid of circumstances, and by a reasonable construction of their acts, to arrive at their meaning.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “even if we find substantial evidence supporting the claimant’s position [that his mental impairments were severe], we still must uphold the ALJ’s decision if substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s decision”
  • “Accordingly, because of the lack of retrospective diagnoses and any other record evidence of schizophrenia or hoarding disorder during the Relevant Period, the ALJ could properly find that Lau did not suffer from such medically determinable impairments during that period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Been, Bench, Monroe, Provosty, Seat, Takes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.