Watson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that § 5-Í-103 and § 16-90-120 were not in conflict and that § 5-4-103 did not repeal § 16-90-120
• finding that § 5-4-103 and § 16-90-120 were not in conflict and that § 5-4-103 did not repeal § 16-90-120

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-27· cited 61×
• Neely v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2010-11-18· cited 14×
• Sesley v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2011-03-10· cited 13×
• Watkins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2009-02-25· cited 10×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1970-10-12· cited 40×
• Robinson v. Langdon
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-06-25· cited 30×
• Graham v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-09-20· cited 28×
• Redding v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1973-04-23· cited 19×
• Manatt v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-11-09· cited 17×
• Cotton v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1974-05-13· cited 10×
• Mixon v. Mixon
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-03-03· cited 6×