Skip to main content

Watson v. State

Citations

  • 776 N.E.2d 914
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1702
  • 2002 WL 31323239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding good cause to allow the State to amend its charging information to include an habitual offender charge
  • rejecting Watson’s contention that he was unaware of the potential risk of navigating a curve at a high speed, reasoning that a posted sign warned of an upcoming curve and concluding that “[he] cannot now claim that he was unaware of the danger of an incident.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Riley, Mattingly-May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.