Skip to main content

Watson v. State

Citations

  • 410 So. 2d 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the initial granting of motion for a judgment of acquittal by the trial judge triggered double jeopardy where there was no indication in the record that the matter was still under consideration when he made such ruling
  • finding that “the ruling of the trial judge made the day before, without any indication that the matter was still under consideration, had progressed toward finality beyond the point that would permit its retraction or correction”
  • “Once a defendant obtains an acquittal after jeopardy attaches ... the double jeopardy clause bars retrial.”
  • “[A]t least until the hearing has come to - 49 - an end, the trial judge may reverse himself on a ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal.”
  • jeopardy attaches once defendant obtains an acquittal even if the acquittal is erroneously obtained
  • not final until the motion hearing is concluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.