Skip to main content
· 4/6/2015

Watson v. Perritt

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 1743
  • 191 L. Ed. 2d 710
  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3785
  • 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The trial judge must ensure that the methods used by the proffered expert are based on the “methods and procedures of science” rather than on “subjective belief or unsupported speculation.”
  • trial court has wide discretion when motion for new trial is based on reasons other than that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, specifically when a party claims that evidence presented at trial was inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.