Skip to main content
· 7/13/2001

Watson v. Parker (In Re Parker)

Citations

  • 264 B.R. 685
  • 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 826
  • 2001 WL 791904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that more than a general attorney-client relationship is required to establish a fiduciary relationship under discharge exception for fraud or defalcation while acting in fiduciary capacity
  • holding that more than a general attorney-client relationship is required to establish a fiduciary relationship under discharge exception for fraud or defalcation while acting in fiduciary capacity
  • holding legal malpractice claim against debtor attorney arising from pre-petition legal representation was pre-petition “claim” under section 101(5
  • finding that a creditor’s claim against a debtor arises at the time the debtor committed the conduct on which the claim is based rather than at the time the creditor’s right to payment arises.
  • explaining the doctrine of laches may apply to an unreasonable delay in reopening where prejudice to creditor exists
  • “[PJursuant to the plain language of the statute, a claim will exist if some pre-petition conduct has occurred that will give rise to liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFeeley, Chief Judge, Clark, and Bohanon, Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.