Skip to main content
· 12/19/1990

Watson v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 564 N.E.2d 302
  • 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 1659
  • 1990 WL 210255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Normally, the materiality of a misrepresentation is a question of fact for the jury, but it may be determined as a matter of law if the evidence is such that there can be no reasonable difference of opinion.”
  • materiality established by affidavit from claims analyst

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Ratliff, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.