Watson v. Consolidated Edison of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fraud and fiduciary duty claims that “directly relate[d] to plaintiffs’ employee benefits plans and allege[d] misconduct by defendants in the administration of those plans” were expressly preempted
• “[P]laintiffs’ fraud and fiduciary duty claims directly relate to plaintiffs’ employee benefit plans and allege misconduct by defendants in the administration of those plans, claims that fall directly under ERISA’s express preemption clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).