Watson Ex Rel. Lewis v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a [factual] finding must be more than possibly or even probably wrong; the error must be pellucid to any objective observer”
• “[M]aking sense of the battle of experts is the essence of most medical malpractice trials.”
• finding no clear error in determination that ambulatory care clinic was not required under applicable standard of care to stock Mannitol, since evidence suggested that “Mannitol was not a medication normally administered outside of a hospital setting”
• “[W]e are unable to conclude that [the appellant] has met her burden of showing clear error merely by pointing to competing testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).