Skip to main content
· 3/27/2012

Watson ex rel. D.J.W.B. v. Hortman

Citations

  • 844 F. Supp. 2d 795
  • 2012 WL 1038764
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41679

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “issues about the meaning of this clause” have “been the subject of extensive litigation in the federal courts”
  • noting that ”[t]he BIA’s decisions are particularly unworthy of deference, in that West contained little reasoning in support of its conclusion”
  • “The BIA’s decisions are particularly unworthy of deference, in that West contained little reasoning in support of its conclusion on this point, and Kotliar none.”
  • “[t]he word ‘released’ is itself a word of limitation,” and the phrase “when ... released” may also connote a condition that must occur before the Attorney General’s authority ripens
  • “[P]etition[er] raises two issues about the meaning of this clause: what the word “when’ means, and what the word ‘released’ means. The first issue has been the subject of extensive litigation in the federal courts; the second, less so.”
  • labeling competing constructions and collecting cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Everingham, Gilstrap

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.