· 3/27/2012
Watson ex rel. D.J.W.B. v. Hortman
Citations
- 844 F. Supp. 2d 795
- 2012 WL 1038764
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41679
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “issues about the meaning of this clause” have “been the subject of extensive litigation in the federal courts”
- noting that ”[t]he BIA’s decisions are particularly unworthy of deference, in that West contained little reasoning in support of its conclusion”
- “The BIA’s decisions are particularly unworthy of deference, in that West contained little reasoning in support of its conclusion on this point, and Kotliar none.”
- “[t]he word ‘released’ is itself a word of limitation,” and the phrase “when ... released” may also connote a condition that must occur before the Attorney General’s authority ripens
- “[P]etition[er] raises two issues about the meaning of this clause: what the word “when’ means, and what the word ‘released’ means. The first issue has been the subject of extensive litigation in the federal courts; the second, less so.”
- labeling competing constructions and collecting cases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Everingham, Gilstrap
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.