Watson, Crystal Michelle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In a facial challenge to the vagueness of a law, the appellant must show that the law is impermissibly vague in all of its applications.”
• “In a facial challenge to the vagueness of a law, the appellant must show that the law is impermissibly vague in all of its applications.”
• “Terms not defined in a statute are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning, and words defined in dictionaries and with meanings so well known as to be understood by a person of ordinary intelligence are not to be considered vague and indefinite.”
• “Terms not defined in a statute are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning, and words defined in dictionaries and with meanings so well known as to be understood by a person of ordinary intelligence are not to be considered vague and indefinite.”
• “Terms not defined in a statute are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning, and words defined in dictionaries and with meanings so well known as to be understood by a person of ordinary intelligence are not to be considered vague and indefinite.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).