Watson Coatings, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant bank could not have violated Section 469.270 “because it did not have- actual knowledge that the checks were in payment of a personal debt of [the fiduciary].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).