Skip to main content
· 3/3/1919

Watrous Varnish Co. v. Nemirovsky

Citations

  • 71 Pa. Super. 264
  • 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 85

Syllabus

<p>Sales — Guaranty—Mailing■ notice of modification — Affidavit of defense.</p> <p>In an action on a guaranty for the payment of a running account, an affidavit of defense is insufficient, which, alleging a modification of the guaranty, in the form of a letter prescribing new conditions, fails to set forth specifically the place of mailing of the letter and the time required for its transmission to the addressee. Where the time of receipt is so important, it should he set forth in the affidavit of defense.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.